Deterministic if-then automations you define, governed workflows with versioned publishing and run history, and AI-driven goals — three surfaces for three jobs, all sharing one hard rule: external messages stay manual-review only.
No credit card needed
An automation is a multi-step sequence that fires on record events — a lead is created, an opportunity changes stage, a job completes. Deterministic by design: the same trigger and inputs always produce the same actions, so your SOP runs the way you wrote it.
Author workflows visually — triggers, action nodes, conditions — with validation that names each problem before you can publish. Some workflows ship with your pipeline pack; the ones you build sit beside them, versioned and observable.
The builder is a desktop surface — on mobile you can monitor runs, not author flows.
Publishing opens a review that buckets the flow’s nodes by impact — human review gates, customer-facing output, agent launches, child workflows, stage-gate decisions — and confirms the standing rule: external messages stay manual-review only. Drafts go to a queue; a person sends.
Every execution lands in run history with a status and a node-by-node timeline. Open a failed run to see which node stopped, why, and retry or cancel — automation you can debug beats automation you have to trust.
Automations for deterministic if-then logic you own. Workflows for governed, versioned, observable definitions — yours or your pack’s. Goals for AI-driven, confidence-scored proposals. They share one substrate, one customer record, and one approval discipline.
Three surfaces, one rule of thumb. Automations are yours: deterministic if-then sequences you define — same trigger, same inputs, same result, every time. Workflows are governed definitions — shipped by a pipeline pack or built in the builder, versioned on publish, observable in run history. Goals are AI-driven: an agent watches for records matching a condition and proposes actions with confidence scores. Use the simplest one that does the job.
No. External messages stay manual-review only — the “Draft customer reply” action writes a draft to a review queue, and the customer never sees anything until a person approves it. The publish-review dialog explicitly lists every customer-impacting node before a workflow goes live, so there are no surprise sends.
Yes, on both surfaces. Most automations support a dry-run against a sample record before you enable them. Workflows validate before publishing — errors block, warnings don’t — and every execution lands in run history with a node-by-node timeline, so you can see exactly where a run stopped and retry it.
Publishing creates an immutable version. New runs use the new version; runs already in flight keep the version they started on. Your mid-flight approvals never change shape underneath you.
Every claim on this page is documented in the help center.
Related: Goals · Follow-Up Tracking · Vertiqa vs the HubSpot + Calendly + Zapier stack
Thirty days, every tool, no credit card. Wire your inquiry-received flow in an afternoon — drafts wait for you, nothing sends alone.
Every tool included. No credit card needed.
Trusted by












