Workflows & Automations

Automation that runs your SOP — and never emails a customer alone.

Deterministic if-then automations you define, governed workflows with versioned publishing and run history, and AI-driven goals — three surfaces for three jobs, all sharing one hard rule: external messages stay manual-review only.

No credit card needed

If-then automations with dry-run testingVisual workflow builder with publish reviewCustomer-facing output always human-approved
Automations

Same trigger, same steps, every time

An automation is a multi-step sequence that fires on record events — a lead is created, an opportunity changes stage, a job completes. Deterministic by design: the same trigger and inputs always produce the same actions, so your SOP runs the way you wrote it.

  • Pick a trigger, string actions: send email, create task, update field, branch on condition
  • Template cards with live preview; enable or disable without leaving the list
  • Dry-run most automations against a sample record before flipping them on
Workflow builder

Build governed flows on a canvas

Author workflows visually — triggers, action nodes, conditions — with validation that names each problem before you can publish. Some workflows ship with your pipeline pack; the ones you build sit beside them, versioned and observable.

The builder is a desktop surface — on mobile you can monitor runs, not author flows.

  • Canvas with add-node menu, per-node configuration, and autosave
  • Action nodes like append timeline event, add tag, send notification, draft customer reply, start an agent run
  • Branch on any field — “if the source channel is voice, do this instead”
  • Validation blocks on errors, publishes on warnings — each error names its exact field
Publish review

You see every customer-impacting node before go-live

Publishing opens a review that buckets the flow’s nodes by impact — human review gates, customer-facing output, agent launches, child workflows, stage-gate decisions — and confirms the standing rule: external messages stay manual-review only. Drafts go to a queue; a person sends.

  • Customer-impacting nodes listed explicitly at publish time
  • “Draft customer reply” writes to a review queue — never straight to the customer
  • Published versions are immutable; in-flight runs keep the version they started on
Run history

When something stops, you can see exactly where

Every execution lands in run history with a status and a node-by-node timeline. Open a failed run to see which node stopped, why, and retry or cancel — automation you can debug beats automation you have to trust.

  • Run statuses: completed, waiting, failed
  • Node timelines show exactly where execution stopped
  • Retry and cancel from the run, with failure details attached
Three surfaces

The right tool for each kind of “automatic”

Automations for deterministic if-then logic you own. Workflows for governed, versioned, observable definitions — yours or your pack’s. Goals for AI-driven, confidence-scored proposals. They share one substrate, one customer record, and one approval discipline.

  • Automations: you define trigger and steps — predictable by construction
  • Workflows: pack-shipped or built, published as immutable versions
  • Goals: agents propose; you set the autonomy dial per goal
ReplacesZapierMakeFor the flows between your core tools — nothing to wire, nothing to babysit. Keep Zapier for its thousand-app catalog; ours talk to one shared record.
Straight answers

Asked plainly

What’s the difference between automations, workflows, and goals?

Three surfaces, one rule of thumb. Automations are yours: deterministic if-then sequences you define — same trigger, same inputs, same result, every time. Workflows are governed definitions — shipped by a pipeline pack or built in the builder, versioned on publish, observable in run history. Goals are AI-driven: an agent watches for records matching a condition and proposes actions with confidence scores. Use the simplest one that does the job.

Can a workflow email my customer automatically?

No. External messages stay manual-review only — the “Draft customer reply” action writes a draft to a review queue, and the customer never sees anything until a person approves it. The publish-review dialog explicitly lists every customer-impacting node before a workflow goes live, so there are no surprise sends.

Can I test before turning something on?

Yes, on both surfaces. Most automations support a dry-run against a sample record before you enable them. Workflows validate before publishing — errors block, warnings don’t — and every execution lands in run history with a node-by-node timeline, so you can see exactly where a run stopped and retry it.

What happens to running workflows when I change a definition?

Publishing creates an immutable version. New runs use the new version; runs already in flight keep the version they started on. Your mid-flight approvals never change shape underneath you.

Dig into the details

Every claim on this page is documented in the help center.

Related: Goals · Follow-Up Tracking · Vertiqa vs the HubSpot + Calendly + Zapier stack

Automate the process. Keep the judgment.

Thirty days, every tool, no credit card. Wire your inquiry-received flow in an afternoon — drafts wait for you, nothing sends alone.

Every tool included. No credit card needed.

Trusted by

  • AgentVerticalAI
  • AlHiba
  • AmeyaAI
  • Blinkr
  • EquiB
  • HRSanad
  • LandMyJobAI
  • Machi Finserv
  • Swaas
  • Tech North Atlanta
  • Tech Passionate
  • TruSkillAI
  • Venture Studios Hub